Saturday, 20 September 2014

Scotland say ney for now, Dont mourn organise !

Yesterday Scotland voted against independence. Today half the country are mourning, their hopes of a new state and it’s social democratic promise dashed. The other half are relieved, if perhaps not enthusiastically celebrating, the potential uncertainty removed; things will persist as before. We neither mourn nor celebrate. The scaremongering of the No campaign would likely have proved largely unfounded. So too would the promises of the Yes campaign. In reality our lives would have continued mostly as they did before in either event. We will trudge to the same jobs we hate along the same roads, through the same congestion on the same expensive transport. We’ll do so so we can pay our wages back to the capitalist class in the same shops, to pay rent to the same landlords and mortgages to the same banks. We’ll take our kids to the same schools with the same education system, when we’re ill we’ll wait to use the same hospitals. We’ll escape our jobs to the same parks, beaches, museums and pubs. An independent Scotland would in most respects have resembled the Scotland of the UK, a patriarchal, capitalist, environmentally destructive society. A country with the most unequal land ownership in the developed world – where 50% of the land is owned by just 432 individuals. A country dependent on North Sea oil for much of its exports – oil that must be left in the ground to prevent climate catastrophe. A country with huge poverty and huge wealth and little in the way of organised working class action to change that dynamic. And in so continuing to uphold the same institutions, the same structures of power, the same business interests, and the same political configuration, our fight against the state, capital and oppression continues. Social Movements It has become popular amongst some on the pro-independence to claim that even in defeat politics has been radically altered. People are engaged with politics for the first time, turnout was 85%. A new broad popular social movement is born, the referendum was never about a vote for the Nationalists (capital N1). The campaign they built to push for independence will now re-orient itself against the Scottish and British governments and push for material concessions, emboldened by how close they came and bringing newly radicalised people with them. But a high turnout in itself tells us very little of what will come next, the complacency that we have already changed politics is dangerous. Leaving aside the tactical mistake of offering the SNP the support they wanted to pass the referendum and then hoping to win concessions rather than making those concessions a precondition of support, this seems at best an optimistic prediction, which is far from certain to be realised. It is highly probable that the movement built to advance a radical case for independence will fail to maintain the unity it has shown pre-referendum in a post-referendum situation. A new left unity party (perhaps Left Unity itself) seems likely to form out of the Radical Independence Campaign and will have to compete for votes with the Scottish Green Party. The disintegration of the SSP last decade bodes ill for the lasting chances of that configuration. If the parliamentary left can regain even the position it held from 2003-2007 it will have done exceedingly well (in its own terms). Undoubtedly many from the radical independence movement will want to maintain extra-parliamentary organisation, though how much of it is truly independent of the parliamentary parties will be an open question. But as with the referendum itself elections have a tendency to draw activists away from direct struggle and towards themselves however good peoples’ intentions are. Perhaps the most debilitating effect of the referendum campaign was its draw away from other, more meaningful, sites of struggle – the boycott workfare campaign, anti-deportations and pro migrant work, environmental organising and so on. Of course, that is not to say that no independence campaigners continued their engagement with these causes, but no one has unlimited time and energy to contribute, and that expended on the referendum could have been better placed elsewhere. Ecology As the independence referendum moves into the past, other issues may start to regain their prominence. Foremost must be the commitment of politicians in Westminster and Holyrood to continuing extraction of Scotland’s share of North Sea oil. The independence debate was consistently shaped by the prospects for oil production and how the proceeds will be distributed. Even where criticism did exist and a call for a “green new deal” was made, the focus was to argue for renewables. Whilst greater use of renewable energy is to be welcomed, it is far from sufficient. As Jason Moore has highlighted energy revolutions of the past have always been additive and substitutive. Market logic plus intervention for renewables will only give us both renewables and fossil fuels. As alternative grow fossil fuels prices will fall and maintain their use alongside. Real decarbonisation of society requires the fuels be left in the ground and their value written off. You cannot build a “green” capitalism. You certainly cannot create it in time. There is too much money invested in fossil fuels – in drilling, in mining, in fracking. The ruling class will never voluntarily give up this wealth, or allow it to be simply voted away. “To survive we must act now” and “couple bleak reality with the utopian impulse” to demand a complete transformation of our society2. An independent Scotland would have relied heavily on fossil fuels – not least to maintain currency reserves and a positive balance of trade. The extraction of North Sea oil will instead continue to prop up the UK’s trade deficit. As part of a larger economy that dependence may now not be brought as clearly to the fore. But that reliance must be exposed, and it must be broken. That will be an expensive and difficult task, but one which we have no choice but to take up – there will be no future for Scotland or the UK if we do nothing. We must create the movement which makes that possible. Too much time has been spent on bourgeois constitutional questions while the rich consolidate their wealth and power, impose austerity and hardship and leave the planet to burn safe that adaptation will be good enough for them. So tonight, drown your sorrows. Take time to regain your energy and when you’re ready come back to join us. The better society that had been pinned on independence doesn’t need a new state. Keep talking to your neighbours and your workmates. We have a world to win and only our own working class self-activity and organisation will secure it. 1. We’ve discussed previously the obfuscation of “good” and “bad” nationalism and the left’s claim that independence has nothing to do with nationalism. In our opinion both yes and no campaigns de facto represent competing nationalisms, whatever their intentions to the contrary. with thanks and solidarity with statement from Edinburgh Anarchist Federation


  1. I keep reading that article you have now posted on your blog comrade and have to say that the more I read it the more I disagree with it...

    It’s very cynical of the Yes campaign in many respects, it dismisses by not mentioning the fact that thousands of workers got involved in politics for the very first time in all probability, which if anything, should be welcome by all, some it is true may have been turned off over the years by politics as practiced by the Westminster elite, and who can blame them, it's understandable when there is only a cigaret paper of difference between the main players of Labour and Tory if that, we know what to expect if elected, that Labour would keep all the tories austerity cuts and therefor attacks on the living standards of all working people in place, because they have told us as much.

    But the point that I really wish to make is winning, engaging and captivating the interest of thousands of workers and young people, is that a good or a bad thing? It’s something that the authors don’t seem to mention anything about, which makes me wonder what they were doing during the referendum campaign they don’t say, may be Mark you could tell me as I cannot find anything on there website and there is no facility to post a reply or ask a question in regard to their post, not very open organisation then?

    The thing about scaremongering of the No campaign, is that it worked, it pushed out and into the polling booth the No voter and of course we now know that the 65+ age group won it for the unionists and without them they would never would have done it, but it also means that an older generation that are probably financially better off and enjoying their retirement, something that the younger electorate and voter can only dream of as the posts are moved farther back, worse for 16 year olds in this election they may never be able to retire the way things are going, so the older 65+ was used to great effect by the Naw camp.

    “An independent Scotland would in most respects have resembled the Scotland of the UK, a patriarchal, capitalist, environmentally destructive society.”

    That statement is not exactly correct and very naughty, first of all the biggest existing commitment made and yes by the SNP was or would have been the removal of Nuclear Armaments from Scotland that on it’s own and if nothing else would have been worth voting for even if that’s all independence achieved. To think that over a million people voted for disarmament in a part of Britain and after all the wars we have been in is not to be scoffed at in a scornfully derision or mocking way as I think this article does, no reflection on you Mark. Part One

  2. I think we should be asking what, so what is it that unites the entire lying twisting capitalist press, the entire treacherous capitalist class of bankers , hedgefunders, gamblers on the Stock Exchange , the Westminster Millionaires and their snivelling lackeys, the control freaks like Brown and Darling who have raced to the helm to put the boot in the Scottish Independence movement ? What is the name of the stinking brush that tars them all together? None of these Westminster 'leaders ' were seen fit to be Prime Minister in the last election so its not 'leadership' or 'talent' that unites the Westminster cabal--- it was a hung parliament remember- but they have managed to unite and cobble together a sort of rogues gallery in a determined move to try to ensure they can continue to carry out Thatcher's legacy of 'Neo-Liberal Austerity policies' which in simple language means the rich 1% get richer without needing to invest in industry and they can foil any opposition because they have what remains of the trade union movement in their pockets .They believed they did not need to provide jobs for the 99%. because they thought in their arrogance they no longer needed to worry about any real opposition against their attacks on the welfare state because they thought that Margaret Thatcher had destroyed the combative power and resistance of the working class for all time ! But in Scotland with the Independence movement they have been caught off guard -it might not look like Class War but Class War is actually what it is -in a different manifestation .And the Scottish people have created a mass social grassroots movement that will not go away whatever happens.Its generated and empowered by the masses , its grassroots democracy in action and its from the housing estates of Glasgow and across Scotland .The ruling class have miscalculated .The genie is out of the bottle and they don't know whether they are on their arses or their elbows. Venceremos! Solidarity with the Independence movement and the Scottish Yes campaigners! They are magnificent! And so are you Mark sorry that this is a bit long!